16 October 2014

The Deposit Protection Service is costing taxpayers £12.7m, it has emerged.

The revelation about the 'bail out' came in a reply to a question in Parliament, asked by Chris Kelly, Conservative MP for Dudley South.

He asked about financia

However, while the original agreement was set up at a time when it could never have been envisaged that low interest rates would fall to 0.5%, the agreement did provide for a guarantee of Government support if necessary.

This week, answering Mr Kelly's question, housing minister Grant Shapps revealed that the original agreement would have left the taxpayers liable for over £30m by next year, when the original contract was due to end.

Shapps revealed that a new, revised agreement was drawn up. This removed the guarantee and all associated liabilities, and incorporated a payment of £12.7m. The revised agreement also extended the original agreement by four years.

Kevin Firth, director of the DPS, said: "There's nothing further to add. The DPS continues to successfully deliver the custodial scheme with 200 new landlords registering every day and in excess of 750,000 deposits currently protected."

News of how much the DPS is costing taxpayers may come as a shock to the Scottish government, which is introducing compulsory tenancy deposit protection.

It has banned insurance-backed schemes such as the TDS and Mydeposits in favour of services such as the DPS, which physically remove tenants’ money from landlords and agents for the duration of the tenancy.

The full exchange in the House of Commons is below:

Chris Kelly: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government -

(1) pursuant to the answer to the Hon. Member for Selby and Ainsty of 5 April 2011, Official Report, column 855W, on tenancy deposit schemes, what financial payments were made or underwritten by his Department as part of the revised agreement negotiated in August 2010;

(2) what the estimated shortfall arising from low interest rates was that resulted in the revised agreement negotiated in August 2010;

(3) if he will place in the Library a copy of the revised agreement of August 2010, redacting any commercially confidential elements to facilitate disclosure.

Grant Shapps: A service concession agreement that was originally agreed by the previous Administration with the custodial tenancy deposit protection scheme contained a guarantee that the Government would meet any shortfall arising if approved fees were not covered by the interest on deposits held.

As a result of the low interest rates that emerged due to the financial turmoil in 2008 and 2009, this agreement left the Government - i.e. taxpayers - liable for a shortfall under that guarantee which was estimated to reach over £30m by the end of the contract in 2012.

In May 2010, the Coalition Government inherited this unacceptable situation and looming liabilities. Following extensive negotiations in summer 2010, the guarantee and all associated liabilities were removed as part of a revised agreement which also incorporated a payment of £12.7m and a four-year extension of the original agreement.

The new agreement has been designed not only to remove future and current liabilities for Government and secure the best deal for taxpayers, but also to safeguard the ongoing viability of the custodial model of tenancy deposit protection and safeguard the interests of tenants.

Hon. Members and the broader public will rightly wish to scrutinise the poor decisions of the last Administration. The new agreement was made in the form of a letter amending the original, flawed agreement. Redacted copies of both documents will be deposited in the Library of the House in due course.

The Property Ombudsman
Association of Residential Letting Agents
Association of Residential Letting Agents
On the Market January 2015
Safe Agent Logo
Martin House Logo